|
Review: For Our “bright future” by Takashi Kitakoji, the “bright future school”:
Misunderstood as a cynical technician specializing in various “screwballs”
(if speaking in the baseball term), Kiyoshi Kurosawa is an authentically
cinematic director, specializing in straight balls. When he was to make a film
bright future, I was convinced that he shows genuine “bright future.” “What is
impossible to understand ….., in my words, it is called a “monster” and I think
it odd that you won’t admit there are monsters in this world. I believe that
monsters certainly exist and that it is fine.” (from Kiyoshi Kurosawa interview
during the shooting of this film)
How the authentically cinematic Kurosawa portrays the “bright future” on the
screen? He cannot possibly fabricate a dreamy story by putting the “dark
present” and “dark past” in parenthesis. This is a method of a half-baked
technician.
I’ll give you an easy example. If a seal shows up in a dirty river in Tokyo
or Yokohama, seals are not supposed to live there, so Japanese people feel
unexpectedly attached to this “cute” seal and give it a nickname, or spectators
and reporters from media go crazy. It is like a healing ceremony in order to
even temporarily forget the “dark present”…..
On the contrary, schools of jellyfish floating on the rivers in Tokyo in
bright future are literally “monsters.” Their luminous shapes coming out of
darkness are starkly beautiful, but they can never be cute. If you want to touch
them, they sting you with their poisonous needle with no hesitation.
Furthermore, their poison is not used for some purposes (like revolution?) .
They are “incomprehensible” or “monsters”, according to Kurosawa’s definition.
After some victims were stung, helpless people rush to eliminate them in heavy
protection precisely like those policemen handling the aftermaths of the 1995
Tokyo subway gas terrorism by a cult group. It is important that the “monsters”
for Kurosawa refers not to the terrorists who used sarin gas but to the sarin
gas itself. Kurosawa’s “monsters” are indifferent to human intention like
disturbing the orders in the world or subverting the establishment. Shin-ichiro
Arita
(played by Tatsuya Fuji) perhaps spent his youth in the 1960s and gets excited
by the massive schools of jellyfish in the river. We may detect his
revolutionary past in his excitement, but Kurosawa coldly responds to this kind
of excitement. Shin-ichiro is stung by the poisonous jellyfish. On the other
hand, his son Mamoru (played by Tadanobu Asano) knows everything about jellyfish
as a monster possessing no intention of its own. Therefore, he was attracted by
its beauty. These revolutionaries are met by severe defeat by the counterattack
of the “monsters” they once trained as their tools for revolution. They were
also aspiring for the “bright future” but Kurosawa does not believe such a
revolution. The “bright future” defined by Kurosawa can only be born only after
you admit the existence of the incomprehensible monsters as they are, not as
their useful tools or trying to eliminate them. In this sense, Kurosawa agrees
with the stipulation of the “dark past” and “dark present” that a sort of
revolution is merely an “illusion.” Nonetheless, he aspires for the “bright
future.”
From now on, I will go into the core of my review. The most important and
challenging aspects of bright future are that Kurosawa shows many elements new
to him, although this is authentically Kurosawa film. In this sense, Nimura’s
conversation with Shin-ichiro after the former throws a television antenna down
from the roof of the latter’s modest recycling factory. Nimura comes down to the
ground and asks Shin-ichiro: “Have you ever been up there (looking at the
roof)?” “No” answers Shinichiro. “You can’t see anything from up there. That’s
what I discovered,” continues Nimura. I happened to be present during the
shooting of this scene and I somehow got excited hearing these lines besides the
camera. These casually exchanged lines made me expect an important change
Kurosawa was taking in this film. Somewhat as his own destiny as an excellent
and authentic filmmaker, Kurosawa has obtained the “bird eye’s” point-of-view
looking down the world. Kurosawa’s greatness is to capture the chaotic world and
the scary monsters living there in the perfectly planned and materialized images
on the screen. In bright future, Kurosawa chose to abandon the bird’s eye view
looking down the world from far above….
We are surprised by the tone of his images emphasizing the darkness made
possible by digital video shooting; audacious costumes designed by Michiko
Kitamura; and above all, the emotional scene in which Shin-ichiro embraces Nimura.
We wonder whether we had ever seen such a scene in Kurosawa before. There are
very few female characters in this film. It may be possible to see a gay
triangular relationship of the three males. The prison meeting room scenes
continuously show thrilling moments, and when Nimura shouts at Mamoru that he
will wait for the other for many years until he will be out, it is like a
confession of a lover. Tadanobu Asano all the sudden wonderfully turns cold, as
if he is a genuine femme fatale. Tatsuya Fuji, with the atmosphere of the 1970s
youth film typically shot by director Toshiya Fujita, gives Kurosawa’s film an
“alienating effect.” In the above-mentioned embracing scene, he tells the
distressed youth, “I will forgive all of you, for everything.” Of course,
Kurosawa detects somewhat transcendent=educational “bird’s view point” in his
line, and the director does not allow the two to consummate their “love”. Shin-ichiro
character is like the roles played by actor Koji Yakusho until this film.
Kurosawa and Yakusho share the generational camaraderie however, this is
consciously crushed and Kurosawa keeps suspicious of Shin-ichiro’s viewpoints.
Fuji was at a loss how to interpret this script and during the shooting he told
us that “all three men are part of Kurosawa, but all of them could be the same
person.” This interpretation may be close to the right answer. Kurosawa gave up
the bird’s eye viewpoint to look down the world from far away, but through the
scattered viewpoints challenges the chaotic world. Scattered viewpoints mean
“loving” viewpoints. Generational gaps make distance between loving two,
however, they are close to that rigid distance between the lovers agonizingly
trying to overcome. It seems to me that bright future is Kurosawa’s romantic
movie he challenges to create for the first time or after many years.
Lastly, I would like to mention the young boys, new to Kurosawa. They are
further younger than the generation of Mamoru and Nimura, thus, materializing
the “bright future” in this film straightforwardly. For example, Nimura leads
them to attack the office at night and these boys are so jovial. Kurosawa as an
authentic filmmaker has often portrayed the violent actions of a group and made
his viewers experience the attractive moments of cinema, which is medium
inherently good at depicting dramas of many people. The young boys drama this
time is quite different from Kurosawa’s previous fascistic groups. These young
boys are so happy and enjoy their innocence before they go into the age of
falling in love. It is the abandonment of the “bird’s eye” viewpoint. If you see
something through the “bird’s eye,” all the groups seem to be fascistic.
The last scene of this film seems to be an homage to A High School Girl with
a Machine Gun (Seira-fuku to kikanju, 1981) directed by Shinji Somai. At the
same time, the last scene will make the viewers anticipate a “bright future” and
it is deeply moving. The group of kids wearing the same T-shirt with the face of Che Guebara walks on the street of Omote Sando (A main street in fashionable
area in Tokyo). They will soon fall in love, and suffer from the distance
between lovers, however, at this right moment, they look in front of them and
their future spreads there. On the screen, you cannot find Mamoru or Nimura or
Shin-ichiro. They lost their love and go beyond our views. However, all the
futures exist as some space where we do not exist. After fifty or sixty years,
or several hundreds years, we will no longer be there. To affirm that time keeps
flowing and space keep spreading after our death. To hope and believe that there
is a bright future there. To hope and believe there is our bright future in
front of these young kids (maybe they are looking at the movie camera?) Today,
we come to belong to the bright future school!
|